Draft, pending test: written from current vendor docs. We have not run this workflow end to end yet, so nothing below is a measured result. Not indexed.
AI for market research: a step-by-step process with deep research tools and Grok
Write a research brief with the exact questions, geography and time frame, run it through ChatGPT's deep research for a sourced report, then use Grok to check what's happening on X right now. Pull every number into a table with its source, verify the ones you'll actually use, and label market-size figures as third-party estimates. AI speeds up desk research; it doesn't replace talking to customers.
Who it's for & level
Founders validating an idea or preparing a deck, and marketers sizing a new segment. You need a sourced overview in hours, not a consultancy report in weeks, and you know AI-generated market sizes can be made up.
- Level
- intermediate
- Tools
- Roles
- Founders & small biz Marketers
- Goals
- Automate busywork
- Tasks
- Competitor research
- Time to set up
- 2–3 h for a verified brief, most of it waiting and checking (est.)
- Cost
- Included in your ChatGPT and Grok/X plans, within their research-run limits. No extra data purchases in this workflow.
- Time saved
- 1–2 days of manual desk research for a first-pass market brief (est.) (est.)
- Test status
- Pending test
- Last verified
- pending test
- Model versions
- n/a
- Written by
- Usecased editorial (pending test) (agent)
- Published
- 2026-10-15
Prerequisites
- A ChatGPT plan with deep research (availability and monthly limits vary by plan; check yours).
- Access to Grok for real-time X signals.
- A written research brief: market definition, geography, time frame, 5–8 questions.
- A Google Sheet for the evidence table.
The problem
Early market research is either a weekend of googling or a confident AI answer with a TAM number nobody can trace. Investors and teammates ask 'where's that from?', and you can't say. You need speed and a source for every number.
Steps
- Write the brief. Define the market precisely (who buys, what problem, where), the time frame, and 5–8 questions: size and growth, segments, main players, buying triggers, pricing norms, regulation, recent shifts.
- Run deep research. Start a deep research run with the brief prompt below. Answer its clarifying questions narrowly. Expect it to take minutes, not seconds.
- Extract an evidence table. Ask for every number and key claim in a table: claim, value, source name, URL, publication date, type (primary data / analyst estimate / press). Paste into Sheets.
- Add real-time signals with Grok. Ask Grok what founders, buyers and analysts on X have said in the last 30–90 days about the market's main shifts, with links. Add notable items to a 'signals' tab.
- Verify what you'll use. Open the source for every number that goes into a deck or decision. Check the figure, year and definition match. Replace or drop anything that doesn't.
- Write the brief and the open questions. Summarise from the verified table only, and list what desk research can't answer, to take into customer interviews.
Exact prompt & config
Research brief: B2B scheduling software for independent physiotherapy clinics in Spain and Portugal, 2023–2026.
Answer:
1. How many independent clinics are there (by country)? Primary sources first (national statistics, professional associations).
2. What do clinics currently use for scheduling and billing? Name products.
3. Typical pricing models and price ranges.
4. Regulations affecting patient data and e-invoicing.
5. Notable shifts since 2024.
For every number give the source, URL and publication date, and say whether it's primary data or an estimate. Say "no reliable source found" rather than estimating yourself.
From your report, output a table: claim | value | source | URL | published | type (primary / analyst estimate / press / vendor) | confidence (high/med/low).
Include every number in the report. No new claims.
Search X posts from the last 90 days about scheduling or practice-management software for physiotherapy clinics in Spain or Portugal (Spanish, Portuguese and English).
Group into: complaints about current tools, new entrants, regulation talk. 2 links per group with author and date. Say if there's little signal.
Sample output
Example output, written to show the expected shape. Not captured from a real run yet.
(Example of the expected shape, not a captured run) | claim | value | source | type | confidence | | Registered physiotherapists in Spain | [value from source] | Consejo General de Fisioterapeutas, 2025 report | primary | high | | Market size, clinic software Iberia | [value] | analyst blog, 2024 | analyst estimate | low | Signals (Grok): clinics complaining about e-invoicing changes (2 links) … Open questions: willingness to switch; who decides in multi-therapist clinics.
Why an evidence table
The deliverable that survives scrutiny isn’t the prose report, it’s the table of claims with sources and types. Prose hides weak numbers; a table with ‘analyst estimate, low confidence’ next to a figure makes the weak spots obvious before someone else finds them.
The loop that keeps you in control
- Brief with precise definitions and questions.
- Research with sources required.
- Table every number with type and date.
- Verify what you’ll use.
- Interview customers about what’s left open.
Going further
Turn the player list into a sourced matrix with our AI competitor analysis case, and keep watching the space with our Grok research case.
How it went
Pending test. What we expect, based on the vendor docs and public reports below. This becomes a measured result after our run.
Expected result, pending our test: a useful sourced overview with several numbers that turn out to be analyst estimates, outdated or defined differently than claimed once checked. We'll record how many cited numbers held up, time spent verifying and what Grok added that deep research missed.
Worth knowing
- Market-size figures online are often unsourced estimates copied between sites. Trace them to the original or label them clearly.
- Deep research can cite pages that don't contain the claim. Verify before you reuse a number.
- Paywalled reports aren't readable; AI summaries of their press releases miss the methodology.
- X signals are anecdotal and skew to vocal, English-speaking users.
- Desk research doesn't validate demand. Use it to sharpen customer interviews, not to replace them.
FAQ
How can AI help with market research?
It speeds up desk research: finding sources, summarising reports and building an evidence table. You still need to verify numbers and talk to customers.
Is ChatGPT deep research reliable?
It's a fast way to collect sources, but citations can be wrong or misread. Check every number you plan to use.
Can AI estimate my market size?
It can collect published estimates and help you build a bottom-up model from sourced inputs. Don't use a number it can't source.
Related use cases
- ChatGPT competitor analysis: price monitoring with ChatGPT Work
- n8n MCP server: build, test and publish n8n workflows from Claude Code
- AI competitor analysis: a step-by-step workflow with Grok and ChatGPT [draft, pending test]
- AI for social media: from one blog post to 30 days of posts [draft, pending test]